Sun.Mar.22.2009
// 2:47.AM
I'VE BEEN AWAY.
YOU KNOW, DOING THINGS, GETTING NOWHERE. THE USUAL.
When I was 14, I wrote a poem. It wasn't exceptional or all that good even but it was a poem, nonetheless. Though I don't remember all of it, I can recall the opening lines:
Time flies by like a bird in the sky.
Before I realize it's
today,
tomorrow's passed me away.
These words, the laments of my 14-year-old self, speak to me, every now and again. Tonight is one of those "nows"--or maybe it's an "again." Regardless, the words are with me at this very moment, as I type. Tomorrow has passed me away.
I can try to justify my absence, my neglect. I can tell you marvelous lies, the things you want to hear. I can but I won't.
What I will say is that my computer crashed and that it's taken me several weeks to get all of my much-needed data transferred (i.e., Word documents, photos, and gigabytes of porn). What I will say is that I've cleaned my apartment about a dozen times, though--in all fairness--it's no cleaner today than it was six weeks ago. What I will say is that I've done a lot, that I've spent a good deal of time being "busy," and that, at the end of the day, I have little, if anything, to show for it.
We humans spend a disgusting amount of time doing nothing. This truth is incontrovertible, and it sickens me.
I tweak settings on Facebook. I read Yahoo! headlines. I take naps and watch movies. I stare at the walls and rub my eyes. When all else fails, I curse the silence that surrounds me. Then I go to bed.
Days pass in this way. Far too many to count.
Don't get me wrong, I do other things with my life, with the seemingly but not really endless hours at my disposal. By this I mean that I work; I commute; I study. But in many ways, these activities mean nothing to me and, by extension, to you.
The fact is, we build our lives, our entire existence, around working, studying, and commuting, activities that will never even come close to--let alone touch--what it means to be alive. Life is a mischievous smile on a child's face; it's a mild summer afternoon and a field of crisp, cool grass. It's a harvest moon and a crackling bonfire, a friend's laughter and a lover's kiss. It's the relentless boom of an unchecked subwoofer or the awesome calm of a disciplined mind.
Yes, there are, indeed, so very many ways to describe the good life. What did you say? You want me to give you one more example? OK, but only because you asked for it: life is starting a blog entry, writing for enjoyment, and having the good sense to stop when the exercise ceases to be fun. Seeing as I'd rather be cleaning cat piss out of the carpet than writing at the present moment, I think I'll, uh, stop here. Hey, and talk about good timing--the cat just pissed on my living room throw rug. Woolite, here I come.
Life is cleaning piss out of a living room throw rug at 3 a.m. on a Saturday night. It shouldn't be but, stinking urine as my witness, it is+
Tues.Feb.03.2009
// 11:47.PM

SEVEN REASONS TO READ FICTION IN 2009
When I penned We Are DNA back in the spring of
2008, I remember thinking that times were tough. I mean, heck, gas
cost four dollars a gallon! How much worse could things get, right?
Hah! Wrong.
Given
our economy's present state of compression, everyone is feeling
the squeeze. This, of course, very much includes the bookselling
industry. An unlikely candidate for a government bailout, we're
on our own on this one, and like a ship lost at sea, we are moving
closer each and every day to our inevitable sinking. Many independent
book publishers have already closed their doors. Others have opted
to pause or otherwise suspend their operations indefinitely. These
are dark days, my friends--dark days, indeed.
Still,
I am hopeful. I believe in this industry, believe in myself, and
in the awesome power of the written word. Moreover, I believe in
you--the reader. Your love of literature--both high and base, popular
and obscure--has kept this industry alive and, God-willing, will
continue to do so in the future. That being said, everyone needs
a little encouragement every now and then.
Therefore,
without further ado,
I give you my Seven Reasons to Read Fiction in 2009:
| 1) |
Literature
captures the heart, nourishes the soul, and, best of all,
engages the mind. Think of it as an anti-aging serum for your
brain or, put another way, an Alzheimer's repellent!
|
| 2) |
Fiction
provides readers with a comfortable escape from life's many
stressors. For example, there's not one mention of the word
"economy" in We Are DNA. How sweet is that?!
|
| 3) |
Reading
a good book can be just as enjoyable as a night at the movies,
plus you get to keep the text when you're done. What are you
gonna do with that used movie ticket? Frame it?
|
| 4) |
If
you start a novel and don't like it, you can always return
it. If only I could say the same for opened DVDs and Blu-Rays…
|
| 5) |
Books
are entertainment on the go and can be taken virtually anywhere.
It is advised, however, that you refrain from reading while
in the shower or other non-dry environments (that's where
audiobooks come in handy).
|
| 6) |
There
are novels to suit every conceivable demographic, reading
level, and interest group. Don't believe me? An Amazon.com
search for "Moose Fiction" yields an astonishing
552 results.
|
| 7) |
Lastly,
there are a bevy of emerging authors who want nothing more
than to have your eyes on their pages. Make 2009 the year
you read something new, innovative, and divergent. My recommendation?
There's this guy named Brian Lucas with some pretty radical
ideas. You might want to check him out… ;) + |
Mon.Feb.02.2009 // 8:34.AM

When I woke up this morning, I didn't see my shadow. So why
am I still scared+
Wed.Jan.28.2009 // 11:40.PM

There is hope in window clings. It may be groundless
and irrational, but it is there, nonetheless+
Tues.Jan.27.2009 // 11:54.PM

READERS, KINDLES, & eBOOKS, OH MY WHY?!
Before
I say anything else, let's get one thing straight: I love technology.
I do; I really, truly do. I love my MacBook, love my iPod,
but most of all, I love the many delightful little gadgets that
make life a whole hell of a lot easier. My cell phone.
My GPS. That weird thing in my car that talks to me and responds
to voice commands (I call it "Stephanie"). I love
these contraptions for many reasons, not the least of which being
utility. More than anything else, these buggers have purpose,
function. What I mean by this is that they do things, perform
actions or calculations. They play songs. They give
directions. They tell you when you're right, when you're wrong,
and when you're just plain incomprehensible ("I'm sorry,"
Stephanie deadpans. "I didn't understand you").
If
I choose to purchase one of these gadgets, I do so under the belief
that it will somehow better my life; you know, enhance my driving,
music listening, whatever. That being said, if the item in
question seems even remotely frivolous, needless, or impertinent,
it stays on the shelf (the store shelf, mind you, not that of my
living room). Now I know what you're thinking: well an
iPod isn't exactly essential. And you know what, you're
right; it's not. But an iPod is useful; it is ultra-portable,
and it is only $149. And
this is where things get awkward.
As
an author, writer, booklover, etc, I'm supposed to be ahead of the
game; that is, I'm expected to be embracing new trends, championing
new technologies, and looking toward the future saying, "Yes!
Bring it on." In many ways, I am that person, that advocate.
In one very specific way, I'm not.
I
don't like the Sony eReader or Amazon Kindle. Well, that's
not entirely fair. I don't get the eReader or Kindle.
Although I very much understand the technology behind the product,
I'm totally clueless as to the thing's application, its appeal.
Hear me out on this.
According
to Sony's website,
the latest model of the eReader is $399. As for Amazon's Kindle,
it retails for $359. And for that price you get... well, a
book, really. A digitalized, sluggish to respond, needs recharged
after so many pageturns book. Sure, it's compact (half an
inch thick), sure, its nearly weightless (10 ounces), and sure,
the text size is adjustable, but really, when you get down to it,
it's just another book--a flashy, "look what I've got"
book.
What
strikes me as odd is the popularity of this new technology when,
really, it does so very little to improve upon the existing designs
(namely, hardcover and softcover books). As most of us know,
page-based books archive very well. If properly stored, they
can last decades, centuries even. Moreover, they are easy
to carry, lightweight (especially in mass market size), and remarkably
easy to "start up." There is no loading screen to
watch or RAM to boot. Traditional books can be easily annotated
(that's what the margins are for), left just about anywhere (excluding
textbooks, book theft is rare), and dropped from any/all heights
(I'd like to see how that eReader holds up after crashing down a
flight of stairs). Best of all, they are affordable ($7 to
$25) and easily replaceable.
Now
granted, there is a limit to the number of old-school books that
one may carry at any given time but, in all seriousness, just how
many books does one need at his/her immediate disposal? I
remember that I took three books with me the last time that I flew
to Asia. I think I read one, two at most. See my point?
To
close, I write this post not to bash eBooks and readers but to pose
a very simple but, admittedly, loaded question: why?
Like
all considerate communicators, I know when to talk and when to keep
quiet. I've stated my opinion and outlined my argument.
Now it's your turn. I'm listening+
Fri.Jan.02.2009
// 4:06.PM

ENLIGHTENING
Okay,
so the truth of the matter is that I never intended on revisiting
the whole Bristol Palin baby thing. I thought that I would
comment on the one story, have a few laughs, make some wry observations,
and be done with it. Then Yahoo! went ahead and published
the above (it too was a "Featured" article) and well,
to be frank, I just couldn't resist.
Again, I ask the news-media, "Why?" Why is this
pseudo-story thought to be something with which the public should
concern itself? Why do news portals give prominent placement
to articles such as these, throwing them in and around the real,
hard-hitting headlines? When
browsing the Yahoo! News homepage, one goes from "Civilians
taking brunt of Gaza offensive" to "Ford expects catastrophic
losses" to "Alaskan governor's eighteen year old daughter
says motherhood 'not ideal'." I don't know about you,
but this reminds me of a common standardized test question, one
that reads, "Which of the following does not fit?".
Now don't get me wrong; I could more than understand one's placing
the article on the news homepage in so long as it were posited somewhere
else, anywhere else than below the banner reading, "Headlines."
I'm sorry, folks, but this just isn't breaking news (nor all that
substantial of a press release, if I do say so myself). Wow,
so Bristol understands that teenage motherhood is not ideal?
Hm, that means her opinion aligns with that of most Americans.
Shocking.
Then
again,
I must admit I've learned quite a lot from this whole Bristol gives
birth controversy. I've learned that the news-media gives
equal weight to both soft and hard news, without discrimination.
I've learned that Bristol's pregnancy is just as important
as the air raids in Gaza and the economic downturns here at home,
but more than that, I've learned something that no Yahoo! headline
would ever dare say:
It's
time to change my homepage.
I
leave you, my friends and devoted readers, with the wise words of
the enchantress otherwise known as Sarah Palin.

Now that's what I call separation of church
and state! I love how no matter the issue or predicament (war,
foreign policy, babies born out of wedlock), Lady Palin always brings
it back to good ole God. And Sarah, you're right--that is
sooooooooo like Him+
Tues.Dec.30.2008 // 12:25.AM

THANK YOU, YAHOO!
God,
I've been waiting on pins and needles for this news to break!
When I found out that good ole Bristol was pregnant, I found myself
wondering, "What will she give birth to?!" I mean,
there were so many possibilities. She could have had a boy
or a girl or a turtle or a, well... who knows! Ugh, the suspense
was killing me. Thank God People Magazine paid the Palins
some several million dollars to reveal the shocking truth.
I don't know about you, but I nearly fainted when I read this.
Yes, fainted. I
mean, golly gee, I would have never expected a baby, much less a
boy! Too bad it is only early Tuesday; the weekly rags won't
get to slather their covers with this late-breaking "story"
until Thursday (and that's at the earliest)! Shucks.
Well
anyway, let the battle for first interviews and access to baby pictures
begin! I'm hungry for some posed portraits and gentle, maternal
grins. Oh, didn't you know? New mothers aren't allowed
to smile. Just grin. Oh, and their eyes must be on their
newborns. Keep them on the newborns; always on the newborns.
Well, I take that back; if you're a young mom or still marginally
sexy, then you're allowed a quick, coy glance at the camera.
You know, just a flash of your eyes to keep the focus on you and
away from the spittle-soaked kid. Please see Figure 12.3 below
for more information.

There will be a quiz on this information on Friday (and
pictures of the Bristol baby?)+
Thurs.Dec.04.2008 // 11:14.PM

THERE ARE PEOPLE IN MY CEILING
There
are people in my ceiling
I hear them everyday
Sometimes they walk, sometimes they stalk
I’ve tried; they won’t go away
They move about incessantly
Always up and on their feet
I thought them fine until that day
I awoke to hear them shriek
I saw faces in my window then
All paste, a pallid white
And now they come and visit me
Every godforsaken night
Each time they come they bring a “gift”
A thing I don’t desire
A knife, a gun, a cutting shear
A bat or razor wire
With “gift” in hand, at window’s edge
They tell me what I must do
“You’ll slice your arm and burn your leg
Or we’ll come and murder you”
Some people say these demons they
Exist but in my mind
To them I say “Go rooftop, then
And tell me what you find”
Tonight the wisemen are up again
In ceiling, scuttling about
In hours few they’ll come and you
Will lose all sense of doubt
Oh didn’t I say, rightly explain
They asked for your address
I told them so you’ll soon know
The feel of knife’s caress+
Thurs.Nov.13.2008 // 2:10.AM

BOND AT HIS BRIGHTEST, CINEMA AT ITS BEST
Craig’s James Bond is, quite possibly, the most
psychologically complex 007 to date (and I’m not complaining).

As the opening credits of Quantum of Solace
whir and spin about the screen in that oh-so-classic, uniquely-Bond
style, many thoughts move similarly about my head (that’s
right, my thoughts dance). I wonder to myself, will this film
be any good? Will it pick up where Casino Royale left off? Will
I find out what the hell a “Quantum of Solace” is?
Come the roll of the movie’s closing credits, I have answers
to my questions.
Yes, yes, and yes.
Quantum of Solace is the second in a series of re-imagined
Bond films that began back in 2006 with the blockbuster hit Casino
Royale. By having Daniel Craig play the part of a rougher and
tougher Bond who out-punches quite a few of his predecessors, both
Casino and Quantum alike take the character back
to his early days at MI6 but, to the confusion and dismay of some
longtime fans, choose do so in the present. Put another way, Bond
was, for all intents and purposes, reborn back in 2006, at the age
of thirty-eight. That year, he lost the love of his life, a treasury
agent by the name of Vesper Lynd and, as a result, hasn’t
really been the same since.
Fast-forward to 2008. According to Bond-time, not a single second
has passed since the close of Casino. In the one hour and
forty minutes that is Quantum of Solace, a disconsolate
and altogether emotionally-devastated Bond seeks to exact penalties—both
physical and psychological—on those parties responsible for
Vesper’s death. Whether embroiled in a car chase in Sienna,
a knife-brawl in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, or in high-stakes hand-to-hand
combat in La Paz, Bolivia, Bond keeps his sights on two men: Dominic
Greene, the scheming CEO of an allegedly earth-friendly corporation,
and General Medrano, the ousted but resilient former dictator of
Bolivia. Together, these two tyrants endeavor to manipulate the
US and British governments into supporting a soon-to-be staged coup
which would, if successful, wreak havoc on the ecology and economy
of the developing South American state. Bond, however, has other
plans for the men and their beloved “Tierra Project”—plans
that involve reconnaissance, espionage, and—but of course—lots
and lots of shock-and-awe gunplay.
When judged alongside the two and a half hour-long Casino Royale,
Quantum of Solace is comparably short, but what it lacks
in length, it more than makes up for in style. To start, Quantum’s
plotline is one of few in the franchise’s twenty-two movie
history that isn’t needlessly convoluted or altogether impossible
to follow. If you read the preceding paragraph, you will understand
Quantum of Solace. Further, director Marc Forster (Monster’s
Ball, Stranger than Fiction) does a superb job with
the film’s cinematography and shot composition. His clever
juxtaposition of the civil with the violent (e.g. street level horse
races with subterranean sewer chases) is, on its own, utterly remarkable;
given that he pulls this off in a Bond film, it is something not
to be missed.
Pure icing on the cake, Quantum of Solace is as perfectly
paced as it is emotionally rich. Though Vesper is gone, Bond’s
new leading lady, Camille Montes (Olga Kurylenko), proves a worthy
replacement and a paradox in her own right, being at once strong-willed
yet emotionally crippled. Still, is she—or anyone for that
matter—up to the task of comforting Bond, of restoring his
faith in women? When all is said and done, who is it that can provide
007 with a measure of support, a degree of consolation, a—yes,
that’s right—quantum of solace?
The film hits theaters Friday and comes highly recommended, earning
an impressive three and a half out of four asterisks+
Sat.Nov.08.2008
// 11:53.AM

CHRIST'S FOOL
I told God that I'd meet him at seven,
that there was something for us to discuss.
I took his silence as tacit agreement,
and to his church, well, I proceeded thus.
Arriving several minutes early,
I contemplated just what I might say,
how I would tell him about what happened,
and beg justification without delay.
For, Christ, how could you let this happen, Lord,
For what purpose must you steal his mom?
What need have your angels in heaven,
that they should quake a family's calm?
The hour? It is half passed seven now,
and I'm feeling so terribly dumb,
to believe the Lord would hear my call,
and to my side he'd care enough to come+
Thurs.Oct.16.2008 // 12:25.AM

AUTUMN IN A MUG (OR GLASS):
This Season’s Best Café Selections
When you hear the crunch of dried leaves underfoot and can feel
a certain coolness in the air, it can mean only one thing: New drinks
at Starbucks. Only these drinks aren’t just new, they’re
seasonally-inspired and, to the free market’s benefit, available
just about everywhere. Given the nation’s current economic
climate, coffeehouses will do just about anything—short of
grinding down colored leaves and calling them sprinkles—to
get their hands on your greenbacks. If the idiom holds true and
desperation truly does breed ingenuity, then we’re looking
at one of the finest gourmet coffee menu-boards of all time. After
having sampled some of the best (and, without a doubt, worst) creations
of the season, I’ve returned in order to share my findings.
Listed below are what I believe to be some of the best coffeehouse
selections for fall (in no particular order):
Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Frappuccino
Blended Crème
Think liquefied pumpkin pie. The only thing missing is the graham
cracker crust; a crumbled scone, however, substitutes nicely. Your
sweet tooth will thank you.
$3.80 for a Tall (12 fl. oz.) | 360 calories
Starbucks Hazelnut Signature Hot Chocolate
A silky, nutty twist on an old favorite. Best enjoyed under a canopy
of red and orange leaves. Drink responsibly, though; this guilty
pleasure contains more fat than one of those all-too-irresistible
Rainbow Cookies (another of my Starbucks favorites).
$3.40 for a Tall (12 fl. oz.) | 450 calories
Caribou Coffee’s Hot Apple Blast
What’s better than apple-picking? Why, apple blasting, of
course! The baristas at Caribou have mastered this enigmatic art
form, concocting ciders that are—quite simply—red-delicious.
Best of all, you can enjoy these treats with the knowledge that
you’ve done your body good; if you skip on the whipped cream,
Hot Apple Blasts are entirely fat-free!
$3.80 for a Small (12 fl. oz.) | 320 calories
Seattle’s Best Crème
Caramel JavaKula
Frozen coffees go best with unfrozen roads. Before Father Winter
wreaks havoc on our streets, let him wreak tastiness in your drink.
Built on a smooth-roasted coffee base and reinforced with pump after
pump of creamy caramel, this is the JavaKula to beat all JavaKulas.
It pairs nicely with candy apples and itchy sweaters+
$3.50 for a Small (12 fl. oz.) | 350 calories
Sun.Oct.12.2008
// 2:01.AM

some say sadness creeps up fast; i say it never really leaves.
loneliness too.
i've been here before. sure as life goes on, i'll be here again.
some
say we arrive and depart; i say we close our eyes, we reopen them+
Wed.Oct.01.2008 // 12:36.AM
Every now and again, the tedium of day-to-day existence can seem
a bit, well, maddening. Take last week, for instance.
Sometime between missed breakfast #3 and working lunch #4 (more
commonly known as Wednesday and Thursday), I fell indignant, bitter.
My routines were no longer "safe" or comfortable.
They were just plain boring.
That
Friday afternoon, however, everything changed. A tube in the
sky, a one-hour ride, and my life began again. What were once
dulled senses were now wondrously acute. I could smell the
jasmine in the air, hear the horns in the harbor, and--perhaps best
of all--feel the loving pavement underfoot. To be sure, I
was in a different time, a different place. I was in Chicago
and, if nothing else, I was alive+
Because
I've chosen to hide nothing and reveal all, here are just a few
of my fondest memories...

Captions--
I. Does impatience count as an emergency?
II. Being ferocious for the lion who, quite simply,
couldn't get it up.
III. What, doesn't everyone draft on upward-striking
typewriters?
IV. I'm a sucker for fall foliage. Get me a red
tree and I'm yours!
V. Now look thoughtful! Try to pretend there's
something humming or
--at the very least--whirring
in that head of yours!
VI Because she's worth it.
VII. That's some bodacious bling!
VIII. Despite the fact that the smile is fake, I was genuinely happy
when
this photo was taken.
No, really! I swear!
IX. No, you don't understand! He's been
acting very strangely for
some time now. Something's
going on, I just know it. Of
course you can't tell; you
don't know him like I do. Last time
I tried to kiss him, he didn't
even kiss me back. *sniffle*
Do you think he still loves
me?
X. You leave me breathless.
Sun.Sept.21.2008 // 11:41.PM
There are some things that I'll never understand; why, for instance,
crickets chirp at night.
It'd
be easy enough to find out. I mean, a quick internet search would
do the trick. And yet, this will never happen. Not today, not tomorrow,
not even next autumn when my curiosity may or may not resurge. Why
not? Well, apathy mostly. That and the inherent dullness of such
an inquiry. Think about it; I would log onto my computer, open a
browser window, wait for it to load, watch banner ads flash and
fizzle, jump to the nearest search engine, and try dozens of query
strings, all for what? To know something that will, in all likelihood,
remain of little or no significance to me until (and during) the
day I die?
Besides,
I've got better things to do. The mail's piling up. Bills need to
be paid. Those DVD box sets from last Christmas aren't going to
watch themselves. Then there's exercise, late night snacking, and
that overrated thing called sleep. I've got to keep my life in perspective.
The urgent before the trivial; the concrete over the abstract.
It's
a breezy night. The blinds rarely rustle this much. The air is not
so much cold as it is crisp. It feels like fall. In four weeks it'll
be winter. But tonight… tonight the sheets are wet, matted
leaves upon my skin, skin that is rusty and withered. Tonight the
crickets will sing, the blinds will clap, and I'll return to my
kitchen, sit in ugly lamplight, and pay the bills.
There
are some things that I'll never understand+
Thurs.Aug.28.2008 // 12:48.AM
She's
looking at me right now. No, not looking. Staring.
From over there, across the room. I can feel something, an
intensity, radiating out from her eyes. She's not nearby.
I know this much for sure. If she were nearby, I'd hear her.
Seething. That's the best way to describe it. She seethes
when she's near. I can't really describe the sound.
I've tried before and I've gotten nowhere. No one believes
me. "It's all in your mind," they say. "Whatever
would make her do that?" they say. Fools, the whole
lot.
She's
somewhere else now. Closer? Maybe. Hard to tell.
Definitely not within striking distance. No, I'd hear that.
The approach. A stealthy gait is one thing; a silent step,
however, is damn near impossible. Then again, I wouldn't put
it past her. She's done stranger things, crazier things.
I
gotta look. I've no choice in the matter really. This
tension could turn terminal. I won't make it obvious.
Oh no. That's the worst thing I could do. I'll use discretion.
Yes, must be discreet. Just a slow, steady, subtle turn of
the head. No more than thirty degrees, forty most. Just
a simple "I thought I heard something over there" glance.
No haste; no struggle. I'll appear curious yet careless.
Okay. This is it. I'll turn, search my peripheral, look
bored, and turn back. Good strategy. Okay. I'll
start after this next exhalation. For two seconds I'll be
vulnerable then safe once more. Nothing to worry about.
Okay. I'll go on my next inhale. Air is in the mouth.
Air is down the lungs. I'm turning...
...I'm
back. I don't think she noticed. If she did, she must've
cleverly hidden her awareness. She frequently hides things.
I wouldn't put awareness past her. Just one more thing, one
more toy, to add to the collection.
I
was surprised by her location. I thought she'd be sitting
at one of the chairs by the table. I was wrong. She's
over by the orange wall, that ugly mango orange wall, in a high-backed
chair. I'm not exactly sure what she was doing there.
Besides seething, of course. That's a given. I
think her head was down but I can't be sure. The whole damn
scene was nothing more than a corner-of-the-eye haze. Oh hell.
Regardless of whether or not her head was down before, it's surely
up now. She's staring again. Unblinking. I don't
think I've ever seen her blink. Surely she moistens her eyes
like the rest of us. She has to. But why not more often?
And why not when I'm around? Maybe I just don't see it, don't
register it. Maybe I don't want to see it. Maybe the
blinking makes her real. If she doesn't blink, she's not really
awake. Without the blinking, she's not altogether alive.
She's there but she isn't. Like a ghost or bad breath.
Just ephemeral and fleeting.
And
really, I shouldn't worry like I do. I mean, she'll be gone
before too long. How's it go? Multiply by six or seven?
Maybe it's eight. Who knows. She's probably around sixty,
give or take a few years. She can't last much longer.
She doesn't eat well. Never has. I don't think she's
exercised since... well since we bought all of that equipment for
her. Joan said it'd keep her active, that it'd motivate her.
I knew better.
Oh
shit. Holy fuck. Oh, Goddamn, holy fuck. She's
on the move. She's fucking on the move. What's that
word Joan uses to describe her means of travel? She doesn't
"walk", "gambol", or "saunter"...
Christ, what is it?! Oh hell, who cares? She's closing
the gap; she's fucking closing the gap! Well this is it; it's
all over. Fuck, I told Joan to kill her off when she had a
chance. "No," she said. "It's murder,"
she said. Murder. I'll show you murder.
*
* *
Gerald,
Suzie's back in the hospital. I don't know when she'll be
released. At this point, I'm not entirely sure that there'll
come a "when." I know that you don't like the idea
of her being institutionalized but Gerald, I had no choice.
Please don't let the doctors convince you otherwise. You weren't
here. You didn't see the open stapler, the blood. There
were pools of it, Gerald. Honest to God, pools. My stomach
heaved when I saw it. I've tried to be supportive of Suzie's
condition, God knows I've tried, but this kind of thing is just,
well, beyond comprehension. Maple was a good cat--a faithful,
obedient cat. What could possibly possess someone to do something
that cruel, that gruesome to an innocent animal, much less a house
pet? The carpet cleaners are coming on Tuesday. They
said that they will try to dissolve the stains but can't make any
promises.
Wishing you well,
Joan
One last thing--be sure to tell Suzie's doctors
that the word was "skulking". That's what Suzie
was mumbling to herself when I found her. I forgot to mention
this at the time of the incident. I guess it slipped my mind+
Tues.July.29.2008
// 3:04.AM
My
psychiatrist keeps a Lonely Planet travel guide on a bookshelf in
her office. I noticed it today. A blue spine, arial
font. "Paris". I wonder if she knows that
her patients, while waiting for her to be right with them, study
their surroundings and see this book.
I wonder if she knows that we ponder its significance+ |